Dear CEWARN Colleagues,
I am honestly quite puzzled.
You know that I publicly apologized on my professional blog for the mistakes I made when characterizing CEWARN in my recent book review. You also know that I apologized privately to you via email. You kindly offered to provide me with up-to-date information on CEWARN so that I could correct my previous blog posts. So I took your criticism positively and as an important opportunity to learn more and promote CEWARN’s good work.
I very much appreciate the time you took to clarify my misconceptions of CEWARN and took this as evidence that you were serious and willing to disseminate evidence of the successful results achieved by CEWARN. You offered to share with me the contact info for CEWARN’s country coordinators and field monitors. You also kindly offered to share with me additional information on CEWARN’s remarkable progress and achievements.
I sent you two emails one month ago in which I thanked you and took you up on your offers listed above. You have ignored my emails. You have answered none of my questions. You have provided none of the specific information that you yourself had offered to share in the first place.
May I ask why? I have found the rest of the conflict early warning community to be a lot more open and transparent.
Best wishes,
Patrick
1 response so far ↓
CEWARN Reconsidered « Conflict Early Warning and Early Response // October 22, 2009 at 7:01 pm |
[...] September 29, 2009 · 1 Comment See update here. [...]